This just in from the "FBISD Concerns" facebook page. Several posts emanating from facebook pages seem to support a rumor that an official petition has been issued to the Texas Secretary of States office election division requesting election monitors for the May 14th ballot. The public post in question has appeared on several well visited sites and states, "FYI: Confirmation that a petition request has been sent to the TX secretary of states election division requesting state election inspectors to monitor the 40+ polling stations for next Saturdays election here in our county (Specifically FBISD, Sugar Land & Missouri City stations). Apparently 4 of the requesters are current candidates in school board races and city council races from our area. Several other candidates are also supporting the requests for monitoring this cycle."
We will update this once it has been confirmed via local media and/or other sources.
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/home.php?sk=group_195822643783611&ap=1
Showing posts with label special interest. Show all posts
Showing posts with label special interest. Show all posts
Monday, May 9, 2011
Thursday, April 2, 2009
FBI: Change Is In The Air
Tall on claims, short on details
SESHADRI KUMAR, Fort Bend Independent
Change is in the air at the Fort Bend ISD. The district has a chief academic officer and a chief accountability officer, who seem to take their jobs seriously.
District officials have been candid in admitting that FBISD students, especially in elementary and middle schools are faring poorly in science. Not only that, teachers at the schools are not adequately trained to teach them.
But FBISD is not alone and it is a national problem, the administrators quickly point out.
For example, Texas is ranked second in the United States in total population, but 29th in the number of scientists and engineers in the workforce; 4,000 Texas science and math teachers have left the classroom in recent years and it will cost $27 million to replace them; 40% of science teachers in the lowest performing schools failed their science certification examination at least once. . .
. . .Then followed a press release about the Global Center Feasibility Committee, headed by David Wallace, former Sugar Land mayor and a developer.
Wallace quickly swung into action and began gathering information through meetings with various groups.
After attending last week’s public meeting, one could conclude that the concept makes tall claims, but little specifics are known about the project.
What exactly will go into the building remains to be decided. Until that is known and it is clear how exactly the building will be used, it is hard to make a judgment.
The center (or museum as observers put it) will only incorporate physical and earth sciences. What happens to the rest of the scientific world?
There is no convincing proof that such a center will deliver the promised results. Maybe one should take a chance in the interest of the future of our children.
FBISD officials say they have not researched what other school districts are doing about science education, let alone what others in the state or the rest of the nation are doing.
Ten years ago when the school district was approached by the city of Sugar Land to participate in the Sugar Land Town Square project, a planetarium, an IMAX theater, and a science museum were proposed as a carrot. The school district refused to join the project. Today that idea has resurfaced, though entirely for a different reason.
Yes, we are used to building $80 million high school campuses and another $40 million may not matter.
Probably, if the school district wants to build a modern science lab in every campus, even if it costs another $50 million or $100 million, people will know what they are in for and may make an informed decision.
SESHADRI KUMAR, Fort Bend Independent
Change is in the air at the Fort Bend ISD. The district has a chief academic officer and a chief accountability officer, who seem to take their jobs seriously.
District officials have been candid in admitting that FBISD students, especially in elementary and middle schools are faring poorly in science. Not only that, teachers at the schools are not adequately trained to teach them.
But FBISD is not alone and it is a national problem, the administrators quickly point out.
For example, Texas is ranked second in the United States in total population, but 29th in the number of scientists and engineers in the workforce; 4,000 Texas science and math teachers have left the classroom in recent years and it will cost $27 million to replace them; 40% of science teachers in the lowest performing schools failed their science certification examination at least once. . .
. . .Then followed a press release about the Global Center Feasibility Committee, headed by David Wallace, former Sugar Land mayor and a developer.
Wallace quickly swung into action and began gathering information through meetings with various groups.
After attending last week’s public meeting, one could conclude that the concept makes tall claims, but little specifics are known about the project.
What exactly will go into the building remains to be decided. Until that is known and it is clear how exactly the building will be used, it is hard to make a judgment.
The center (or museum as observers put it) will only incorporate physical and earth sciences. What happens to the rest of the scientific world?
There is no convincing proof that such a center will deliver the promised results. Maybe one should take a chance in the interest of the future of our children.
FBISD officials say they have not researched what other school districts are doing about science education, let alone what others in the state or the rest of the nation are doing.
Ten years ago when the school district was approached by the city of Sugar Land to participate in the Sugar Land Town Square project, a planetarium, an IMAX theater, and a science museum were proposed as a carrot. The school district refused to join the project. Today that idea has resurfaced, though entirely for a different reason.
Yes, we are used to building $80 million high school campuses and another $40 million may not matter.
Probably, if the school district wants to build a modern science lab in every campus, even if it costs another $50 million or $100 million, people will know what they are in for and may make an informed decision.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
